<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coverage Wrap-Up:  Delta peripheral canal should be built, report concludes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aquafornia.com/archives/3975/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aquafornia.com/archives/3975</link>
	<description>The California Water News blog!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:16:53 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: California&#8217;s Water Wars: Can We Save Fisheries and Solve Water Problems? : The Trout Underground Fly Fishing Blog</title>
		<link>http://aquafornia.com/archives/3975/comment-page-1#comment-2046</link>
		<dc:creator>California&#8217;s Water Wars: Can We Save Fisheries and Solve Water Problems? : The Trout Underground Fly Fishing Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 17:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aquafornia.com/?p=3975#comment-2046</guid>
		<description>[...] The only real constant in all this has been the wide-ranging coverage provided by the Aquafornia blog, which quickly threw together a post summarizing reactions to the report&#8217;s announcement. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The only real constant in all this has been the wide-ranging coverage provided by the Aquafornia blog, which quickly threw together a post summarizing reactions to the report&#8217;s announcement. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
