<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Los Angeles River may get protection through the Clean Water Act</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aquafornia.com/archives/4322/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aquafornia.com/archives/4322</link>
	<description>The California Water News blog!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:13:16 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Recent News, Upcoming Events &#171; L.A. Creek Freak</title>
		<link>http://aquafornia.com/archives/4322/comment-page-1#comment-2169</link>
		<dc:creator>Recent News, Upcoming Events &#171; L.A. Creek Freak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 07:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aquafornia.com/?p=4322#comment-2169</guid>
		<description>[...] receive greater protection under the federal Clean Water Act.  Read more info here: LA Times  Aquafornia Blog  Daniel&#8217;s News &amp; Views [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] receive greater protection under the federal Clean Water Act.  Read more info here: LA Times  Aquafornia Blog  Daniel&#8217;s News &amp; Views [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
