Water Education Foundation
This is just one post in the DWR & State Water Project Category
Click here to view all posts

Coverage wrap up: Water deliveries slashed 85%; drought in 2009 could be the worst in California history, officials say

Posted by: Aqua Blog Maven on October 31, 2008 at 6:36 am

So many articles this morning across the state regarding the announcement of the initial 15% allocation from the State Water Project. Here’s what they have to say:

From the Los Angeles Times:

State water deliveries could be slashed next year if California continues its dry streak, a move that could lead to widespread rationing.

California Department of Water Resources officials Thursday said water agencies could get as little as 15% of their State Water Project allocations, although that figure could go up if Sierra Nevada rain and snowfall return to normal in the coming months. “We’re clearly making a major call for extra conservation, but also permanent conservation,” said water resources director Lester Snow, who renewed the Schwarzenegger administration’s call for the construction of new reservoirs.

Officials at Southern California’s major water supplier, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, say its board soon will discuss whether to initiate cutbacks. “We are preparing for the real possibility of water shortages and rationing,” said Jeff Kightlinger, the MWD’s general manager.

From the North County Times:

The situation is made worse for Southern California by the rapidly falling level of Diamond Valley Lake in Southwest Riverside County, the region’s primary insurance policy against drought. As a result, Jeff Kightlinger, general manager of the Metropolitan Water District, said there is a “very real possibility” that the ongoing voluntary call to residents in Southern California counties —- including San Diego and Riverside —- to conserve voluntarily will be replaced by a mandatory cutback by May.

“We are one step away,” said Maureen Stapleton, general manager of the San Diego County Water Authority, which buys water from Metropolitan and distributes it to area cities and water districts. And, Stapleton said, “If there is not a drop of rain and a flake of snow between now and mid-January, I can see earlier action being necessary.”

The [San Diego County] water authority and local providers plan to follow Metropolitan’s lead.

From the Long Beach Press Telegram:

Low water storage levels in the state’s major reservoirs, ongoing drought conditions, a growing population and court-ordered restrictions on water deliveries from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta all are to blame for the water shortage, Snow said. Last year, a federal judge limited the amount of water that can be released from the Northern California delta in order to protect the endangered smelt fish.

Without the delta restrictions, the water allocation would have been about 20 percent, Snow said. He said California needs above-average precipitation over the winter to adequately replenish the state’s reservoirs, many of which are below half or a third full. His department’s recommendation is to “hope for the best and prepare for the worst,” he said. “We’re clearly making a major call for extra conservation,” Snow said.

From the Daily Breeze:

The announcement of the allocation comes a month earlier than normal to give local water agencies additional time to develop plans. Most have anticipated tighter water supplies and have taken steps to try to reduce water use.

The Metropolitan Water District, which delivers supplies to 26 member agencies, gets its water from the State Water Project and the Colorado River. General Manager Jeff Kightlinger said there is the possibility of rationing throughout the region, with the first discussions to take place in November.

“It still sends a solemn message up and down California – we all must immediately reduce water use to stretch available supplies,” Kightlinger said. “Over the past two years, Metropolitan has depleted more than a third of its water reserves to deal with drought and court-ordered cutbacks. This is not a short-term problem that will be washed away with a few good storms.”

Richard Nagel, general manager of West Basin Municipal Water District, said Thursday’s announcement was mostly anticipated but underscores the need for people to conserve. West Basin provides water to most of the South Bay and gets roughly two-thirds of its supplies from the Metropolitan Water District.

West Basin will continue promoting conservation as the allocation figure is re-evaluated this year and next, Nagel said. A final figure is anticipated in April. “Each month they come up with an allocation figure. It could be the same, or it could increase, depending on the snowpack (conditions),” Nagel said. “We’re at 15 percent … we need to get to 50 percent or higher to be in the clear.”

From the San Francisco Chronicle:

Water supplies for agencies such as the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission and East Bay Municipal Utility District that don’t rely on the state for water won’t be affected the state allocation.

The five Bay Area agencies that receive water from the state are the Napa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, Solano County Water Agency, Alameda County Water District, Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Zone 7 and Santa Clara Valley Water District.

The agencies said that while the low allocation is discouraging, they already had made contingency plans this summer. “We actually thought the state would come in at 10 percent,” said Paul Piraino, general manager of Alameda County Water District, which provides water to Fremont, Newark and Union City.

Earlier this year, the district decided to augment its groundwater reserves by moving 10,000 acre-feet of water from its underground reserves in Kern County and an additional 12,000 acre-feet from the San Luis Reservoir. “It’s sort of like putting some money in the bank early … for the not-so-rainy day,” Piraino said.

From the Sacramento Bee:

Sacramentans are not directly affected by the forecast, because they don’t depend on the State Water Project for deliveries. The forecast primarily affects water users in the Bay Area and Southern California.

Yet Sacramento should take heed, because it also depends on the parched Sierra Nevada for most of its water supply. Snowmelt stored in California reservoirs is at its lowest level in 14 years.

“In fact, the entire state is wrestling with very serious drought conditions,” said Tim Quinn, executive director of the Association of California Water Agencies. “Wherever you live in California, start conserving water because you are going to be affected if drought conditions persist.”

From Stockton’s Record:

Farmers in the Central Valley said they will be forced to fallow fields, while cities from the Bay Area to San Diego might have to impose mandatory rationing. Mike Young, a fourth-generation farmer in Kern County, called the water projections disastrous. “For the amount of acres we’ve got, we’re not going to have enough water to farm,” he said.

and

Stockton-area water officials repeatedly have said over the summer that this area has enough water to get by, but that the coming winter will be critical for next year. San Joaquin County as a whole has had difficulty finding new sources of water, and the groundwater on which the area has heavily relied is dropping.

From the Bakersfield Californian:

Kern County Water Agency general manager Jim Beck said between the smelt and explosive Central Valley population growth, there is far more demand for water today than during the last major drought of 1988 to 1992.

That means farmers are going to have to add to the 20,000 acres left fallow this year for lack of water. Beck estimates 90,000 acres in Kern County will be affected next year, including 50,000 not planted at all, and 40,000 acres of permanent crops watered enough to stay alive but not enough to bear fruit.

Groundwater banking has helped ease the water shortage up to now, but because of the Delta issue, “We won’t have opportunities to replenish those supplies for use in future droughts,” Beck said.

From the San Diego Union Tribune:

The state has released an initial allocation projection lower than 15 percent only once, in 1993. However, that 10 percent forecast jumped to a full 100 percent of supply requests thanks to a bountiful winter. But the overall water picture is even more bleak today than it was in 1993. Reservoirs are half-full. Court-ordered protections to save the rare delta smelt in the Sacramento delta will divert as much as 660,000 acre-feet of water, enough for 1.3 million households a year. And climatic changes threaten to further reduce snowpack.

Last year started out promising, but finished with the driest March-through-May ever recorded. The previous year also produced skimpy amounts of snow. “We have the potential in a third year to have the worst drought in California history,” warned Lester Snow, director of the Department of Water Resources.

Snow said it is clear that the state needs more storage and a canal to carry water through the Sacramento delta, which could minimize threats to fish. “The clock is ticking,” he said.

October 31, 2008 · Filed Under DWR & State Water Project, Drought, Weather & Snowpack, Water Supply

Comments

One Response to “Coverage wrap up: Water deliveries slashed 85%; drought in 2009 could be the worst in California history, officials say”

  1. The Underground’s Short Casts for 2008-10-31 — The Trout Underground Fly Fishing Blog on November 1st, 2008 1:02 am

    [...] says CA water agencies may get as little as 15% of their water allocation this water season: http://aquafornia.com/archives/5324 [...]

Leave a Reply