A stinking corpse: US deceit and theft of Navajo water right
Posted by: Aqua Blog Maven on November 18, 2008 at 6:32 amFrom the Atlantic Free Press, this commentary:
Today I received one of the most important documents that I’ve ever received as a journalist in Indian country. It details the loss of Navajo water rights, the role of non-Indian attorneys and how uninformed non-Indian journalists come to Indian country and follow the mandates of those they believe to be the “good guys.” Too often, the “good guys” are actually driven by politics and personal motives.
The document is “Navajo Water Rights: Truths and Betrayals,” written in response to an article published in High Country News and Navajo Times, written by Matt Jenkins.
Among the authors of “Navajo Water Rights: Truths and Betrayals,” is Former Navajo Chairman Peter MacDonald.Many years ago, in the 1990s, I was a stringer for Associated Press and covered federal courts. During the federal trial of Former Navajo Chairman Peter MacDonald, I realized that the US government would stop at nothing to remove him from office and put him in prison. “Why?” I asked a Navajo businessman, during a court recess in Prescott, Arizona. “Was it about oil and gas, or coal?” No, the Navajo businessman said. “It is about the water.”
Now, a decade and a half later, I read and understand the importance of Navajo water to the United States, in this document. Navajo water and the electric power made with it, light up the Southwest cities. While the people of the Southwest light up, water their lawns and golf courses and turn on their water faucets, many Navajos haul their water and read by lantern light.
Read more from the Atlantic Free Press by clicking here.
Comments
One Response to “A stinking corpse: US deceit and theft of Navajo water right”
Leave a Reply






It is a “water education” in itself to review the indian water right claims. Suffice to say that these claims will soon change the water allocations on the Colorado River.
A prudent water provider would/should see the merits of a totally new non-tributary Source of fresh water which could be stored in Lake Mead to provide a necessary back-up supply for the region.
They can argue over existing supply all they want. The paper blizzard of litigation won’t produce a single new drop of water or keep Lake Mead FULL and generating 1800 megawatts of renewable energy let alone a reserve back-up supply for the entire region. A million acre foot a year from the Source could !
Development of the non-tributary Source will not damage the environment or the water rights of anyone, anywhere, including those of the native Americans.
You can lead a mule to water, but you can’t make it drink !
WaterSource waterrdw@yahoo.com