Water Education Foundation
This is just one post in the Longfin Smelt Category
Click here to view all posts

Public water agencies throughout California file suit to prevent further water cutbacks

Posted by: Aqua Blog Maven on December 9, 2008 at 6:23 am

From Business Wire, this press release from the Westlands Water District:

The Westlands Water District today joined with 31 other public water agencies in the Central Valley in filing a lawsuit to block a new regulation that would enable state Fish and Game officials to cut off up to a million acre feet of water for two-thirds of California’s people. Those reductions in freshwater supplies would come on top of the court-ordered cutbacks that last year reduced the state’s water supplies by roughly one-third in the midst of the drought.

“We’re taking this action to protect the public interest in our own water supply,” said Jean P. Sagouspe, a farmer on the westside of the San Joaquin Valley who is the president of Westlands Water District. “The Department of Fish and Game’s plan represents an abuse of power and a failure of good science and common sense.”

The lawsuit filed jointly by Westlands and the San Luis and Delta-Mendota Water Authority (SLDMWA) is one of three suits filed against the Fish and Game regulation by public water agencies from Northern and Southern California as well as the Bay Area. Together, the public water agencies opposed to the regulation are responsible for delivering water to more than 25 million Californians and nearly two million acres of agricultural land.

Fish and Game officials want to shut down the operation of the state and federal pumps in order to protect a species of minnow called the longfin smelt. But Fish and Game’s own studies show that longfin smelt do not live anywhere near the pumps. As a result, the agencies point out that shutting down the pumps will not produce any benefit for the fish.

Worse, the Department of Fish and Game is proposing to do nothing at all to reduce the effects of toxic pollution, invasive species, and other problems that the department’s own scientists admit are harming longfin smelt.

If the new restrictions are enforced and the drought persists, Water Resources Director Lester Snow has warned that it “could create a water supply and delivery crisis the likes of which Californians have not seen in decades.” In November, the Department of Water Resources joined with public water agencies from throughout California in submitting extensive scientific evidence in an unsuccessful effort to persuade the state Fish and Game Commission not to adopt this rule.

“California’s leaders should be working together to conserve our limited water supplies and help the public get through this drought emergency,” Sagouspe said. “Instead we see two state agencies working at cross purposes. Nobody benefits if Fish and Game follows through on this plan that proposes to spill into the ocean enough fresh water to serve five million people for an entire year.”

Read more from Business Wire by clicking here.

Comments

One Response to “Public water agencies throughout California file suit to prevent further water cutbacks”

  1. Ray Walker on December 10th, 2008 5:43 am

    Isn’t it true that lawsuits produce volumes of printed words, but not a drop of new water ?

    Why not risk an hour of attorney time to verify a truly new non-tributary fresh water Source that can produce on average a million acre feet (325,900,000,000 gallons) of water EACH YEAR for California ?

    Why not utilize the unused air space in Lake Mead and other already constructed reservoirs to store the non-tributary water for emergency and environmental purposes ?

    Why not ask the Bureau of Reclamation to confirm that the new non-tribuary water can be stored in Bureau reservoirs like Lake Mead without damage to the water rights of anyone, anywhere ?

    Why not ask those in authority to store the water until needed so that hundreds of megawatts of renewable energy can continue to be generated in existing facilities ?

    Why not have the public agencies confirm that the new non-tributary water can be instrumental in solving many of the environmental dilemmas facing the region ?

    Why is no CA entity/agency/municipality/bureau willing to risk one key stroke to communicate one word so that a million acre foot per year water option can be evaluated and considered ?

    Why should an old man dare to ask such questions ? Does he have the answers ?

    Ray Walker (Retired Water Rights Analyst) waterrdw@yahoo.com

Leave a Reply