<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Public water agencies throughout California file suit to prevent further water cutbacks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aquafornia.com/archives/5866/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aquafornia.com/archives/5866</link>
	<description>The California Water News blog!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:03:52 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ray Walker</title>
		<link>http://aquafornia.com/archives/5866/comment-page-1#comment-4099</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 13:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aquafornia.com/?p=5866#comment-4099</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t it true that lawsuits produce volumes of printed words, but not a drop of new water ? 

 Why not risk an hour of attorney time to verify a truly new non-tributary fresh water Source that can produce on average a million acre feet (325,900,000,000 gallons) of water EACH YEAR for California ?  

Why not utilize the unused air space in Lake Mead and other already constructed reservoirs to store the non-tributary water for emergency and environmental purposes ?

Why not ask the Bureau of Reclamation to confirm that the new non-tribuary water can be stored in Bureau reservoirs like Lake Mead without damage to the water rights of anyone, anywhere ?

Why not ask those in authority to store the water until needed so that hundreds of megawatts of renewable energy can continue to be generated in existing facilities ?

Why not have the public agencies confirm that the new non-tributary water can be instrumental in solving many of the environmental dilemmas facing the region ?

Why is no CA entity/agency/municipality/bureau willing to risk one key stroke to communicate one word so that a million acre foot per year water option can be evaluated and considered ?

Why should an old man dare to ask such questions ?  Does he have the answers ?

Ray Walker (Retired Water Rights Analyst) waterrdw@yahoo.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it true that lawsuits produce volumes of printed words, but not a drop of new water ? </p>
<p> Why not risk an hour of attorney time to verify a truly new non-tributary fresh water Source that can produce on average a million acre feet (325,900,000,000 gallons) of water EACH YEAR for California ?  </p>
<p>Why not utilize the unused air space in Lake Mead and other already constructed reservoirs to store the non-tributary water for emergency and environmental purposes ?</p>
<p>Why not ask the Bureau of Reclamation to confirm that the new non-tribuary water can be stored in Bureau reservoirs like Lake Mead without damage to the water rights of anyone, anywhere ?</p>
<p>Why not ask those in authority to store the water until needed so that hundreds of megawatts of renewable energy can continue to be generated in existing facilities ?</p>
<p>Why not have the public agencies confirm that the new non-tributary water can be instrumental in solving many of the environmental dilemmas facing the region ?</p>
<p>Why is no CA entity/agency/municipality/bureau willing to risk one key stroke to communicate one word so that a million acre foot per year water option can be evaluated and considered ?</p>
<p>Why should an old man dare to ask such questions ?  Does he have the answers ?</p>
<p>Ray Walker (Retired Water Rights Analyst) <a href="mailto:waterrdw@yahoo.com">waterrdw@yahoo.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

