<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coverage wrap up:  U.S. Fish &amp; Wildlife Service issues rules to protect Delta smelt; Some in California could see water supply cut in half</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aquafornia.com/archives/5963/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aquafornia.com/archives/5963</link>
	<description>The California Water News blog!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:48:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Underground&#8217;s Short Casts for 2008-12-17 &#124; The Trout Underground Fly Fishing Blog</title>
		<link>http://aquafornia.com/archives/5963/comment-page-1#comment-4227</link>
		<dc:creator>The Underground&#8217;s Short Casts for 2008-12-17 &#124; The Trout Underground Fly Fishing Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aquafornia.com/?p=5963#comment-4227</guid>
		<description>[...] Smelt biological opinion could reduce Delta water exports by as much as 50%: http://aquafornia.com/archives/5963 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Smelt biological opinion could reduce Delta water exports by as much as 50%: <a href="http://aquafornia.com/archives/5963" rel="nofollow">http://aquafornia.com/archives/5963</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Coffin</title>
		<link>http://aquafornia.com/archives/5963/comment-page-1#comment-4203</link>
		<dc:creator>David Coffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aquafornia.com/?p=5963#comment-4203</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt; DWR estimated Monday that, in average weather years, the cuts could range from 20 to 30 percent. But in roughly one out of five years – typically a wet fall followed by a severe dry year – the cutbacks could reach 50 percent.

Is this 20% to 30% on top of the already reduced SWP allocations which are initially set at 15% (85% below normal) now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt; DWR estimated Monday that, in average weather years, the cuts could range from 20 to 30 percent. But in roughly one out of five years – typically a wet fall followed by a severe dry year – the cutbacks could reach 50 percent.</p>
<p>Is this 20% to 30% on top of the already reduced SWP allocations which are initially set at 15% (85% below normal) now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

