<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poseidon’s Carlsbad plant gets good news &amp; bad news:  The good news: another lawsuit bites the dust, and the bad news: Coastal Commission wants to reconsider its permit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aquafornia.com/archives/8723/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aquafornia.com/archives/8723</link>
	<description>The California Water News blog!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:48:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aqua Blog Maven</title>
		<link>http://aquafornia.com/archives/8723/comment-page-1#comment-14492</link>
		<dc:creator>Aqua Blog Maven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 16:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aquafornia.com/?p=8723#comment-14492</guid>
		<description>Sorry... I meant to pose this as good news and bad news for Poseidon &amp; their plant.  I never intended to put a bias on it, so thank you for pointing that out to me.

I have rephrased the title of the post, and clarified it further in the intros.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry&#8230; I meant to pose this as good news and bad news for Poseidon &#038; their plant.  I never intended to put a bias on it, so thank you for pointing that out to me.</p>
<p>I have rephrased the title of the post, and clarified it further in the intros.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kessy</title>
		<link>http://aquafornia.com/archives/8723/comment-page-1#comment-14491</link>
		<dc:creator>kessy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 16:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aquafornia.com/?p=8723#comment-14491</guid>
		<description>Apparently, the environmental review process is working correctly and keeping all stakeholders on their toes. Isn&#039;t that how the CEQA full-discosure process is supposed to work? Why would either of the above &quot;news&quot; be good or bad,... unless you have something to gain by the desalination plant project going through. Your post sounds very biased.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently, the environmental review process is working correctly and keeping all stakeholders on their toes. Isn&#8217;t that how the CEQA full-discosure process is supposed to work? Why would either of the above &#8220;news&#8221; be good or bad,&#8230; unless you have something to gain by the desalination plant project going through. Your post sounds very biased.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

